Molecular dynamics simulation of engineered Fc-FcγRIIIa complexes as a framework for anticancer monoclonal antibody development

Jebamani Petrina,  Nitin Lingayat,  Murugan Mukilan,  Ravi Aiswarya Krishna,  Dhamodharan Prabhu   

Open Access   

Published:  Oct 17, 2026

DOI: 10.7324/JABB.2026.326155
Abstract

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies exert immune-activating functions partly through the interaction between the antibody Fc region and the FcγRIIIa receptor on the effector cells. Increasing or decreasing binding affinity by engineering this interaction is a key approach taken in antibody drug development for cancer, but whether the changes in affinity are due to global transformation of protein conformation or due to localized changes only is unclear. Here, we address this using comparative 200-ns all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of three Fc-FcγRIIIa complexes: the wild type, the affinity-enhanced S239D/I332E double mutant, and the affinity-abolished V263D mutant, analyzed across seven analytical metrics. The affinity-enhanced complex remained structurally convergent, with backbone root mean square deviation stabilizing at 3.8 ± 0.3 Å, the first principal component capturing 51% of total positional variance, and a free-energy landscape confined to a single basin (~5 kJ/mol ceiling). The affinity-abolished complex showed progressive structural instability, with RMSD rising to 7.1 ± 1.2 Å in the second half of the simulation and conformational sampling dispersed across multiple free-energy basins (~7 kJ/mol ceiling). The wild type occupied a dynamically intermediate regime, with RMSD rising from 4.5 Å to 6–11 Å at approximately 95 ns. These results indicate that binding affinity is consistently associated with global conformational dynamics of the Fc-FcγRIIIa complex. Electrostatic stabilization through three salt bridges drives the enhanced mutant, while hydrophobic core disruption at Val263 drives the abolished mutant. These findings support multi-scale molecular dynamics simulation as a candidate screening approach for engineered therapeutic antibodies in cancer immunotherapy, pending validation with independent replicate simulations and variants of unknown affinity.


Keywords:     Fc-FcγRIIIa cancer immunotherapy anticancer lymphoma monoclonal antibodies molecular dynamics simulation


Citation:

Petrina J, Lingayat N, Mukilan M, Krishna RA, Prabhu D. Molecular dynamics simulation of engineered Fc-FcγRIIIa complexes as a framework for anticancer monoclonal antibody development. J Appl Biol Biotech 2026. Article in Press. http://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2026.326155

Copyright: Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license.

HTML Full Text
Reference

1. Weiner GJ.Building better monoclonal antibody-based therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer 2015;15(6):361–70; doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3930

2. Stavenhagen JB, Gorlatov S, Tuaillon N, Rankin CT, Li H, Burke S, et al. Fc optimization of therapeutic antibodies enhances their ability to kill tumor cells in vitro and controls tumor expansion in vivo via low-affinity activating Fcgamma receptors. Cancer Res 2007;67(18):8882–90; doi: https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0696

3. Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV. Fcgamma receptors as regulators of immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 2008;8(1):34–47; doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2206

4. Raghavan M, Bjorkman PJ.Fc receptors and their interactions with immunoglobulins. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 1996;12:181–220; doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.181

5. Bruhns P, Iannascoli B, England P, Mancardi DA, Fernandez N, Jorieux S, et al. Specificity and affinity of human Fcgamma receptors and their polymorphic variants for human IgG subclasses. Blood 2009;113(16):3716–25; doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-09-179754

6. Radaev S, Sun P. Recognition of immunoglobulins by Fcgamma receptors. Mol Immunol 2002;38(14):1073–83; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-5890(02)00036-6

7. Kremer PG, Barb AW. The weaker-binding Fc gamma receptor IIIa F158 allotype retains sensitivity to N-glycan composition and exhibits a destabilized antibody-binding interface. J Biol Chem 2022;298(9):102329; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102329

8. Desjarlais JR, Lazar GA. Modulation of antibody effector function. Exp Cell Res 2011;317(9):1278–85; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.03.018

9. Wang X, Mathieu M, Brezski RJ.IgG Fc engineering to modulate antibody effector functions. Protein Cell 2018;9(1):63–73; doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-017-0473-8

10. Jo M, Kwon HS, Lee KH, Lee JC, Jung ST. Engineered aglycosylated full-length IgG Fc variants exhibiting improved FcgammaRIIIa binding and tumor cell clearance. MAbs 2018;10(2):278–89; doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2017.1402995

11. Martineau R, Susini S, Marabelle A. Fc effector function of immune checkpoint blocking antibodies in oncology. Immunol Rev 2024;328(1):334–49; doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.13427

12. Oganesyan V, Gao C, Shirinian L, Wu H, Dall’Acqua WF. Structural characterization of a human Fc fragment engineered for lack of effector functions. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2008;64(Pt 6):700–4; doi: https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444908007877

13. Lazar GA, Dang W, Karki S, Vafa O, Peng JS, Hyun L, et al. Engineered antibody Fc variants with enhanced effector function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103(11):4005–10; doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0508123103

14. Pirosa MC, Stathis A, Zucca E. Tafasitamab for the treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024;20(1):2309701; doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2024.2309701

15. Jebamani P, M. Jo, S. Park, S. Kim, S.T. Jung, S.G. Lee, et al. Design of an Fc mutation to abrogate Fcgamma receptor binding based on residue interaction network analysis. ACS Synth Biol 2025;14(5):1677–86; doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.5c00035

16. Sondermann P, Huber R, Oosthuizen V, Jacob U. The 3.2-A crystal structure of the human IgG1 Fc fragment-Fc gammaRIII complex. Nature 2000;406(6793):267–73; doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/35018508

17. Jebamani P, Sokalingam S, Sriramulu DK, Jung ST, Lee SG. Assessment of computational modeling of Fc-Fc receptor binding through protein-protein docking tool. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 2020;25(5):734–41; doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-020-0050-5

18. Jebamani P, Sriramulu DK, Jung ST, Lee SG. Structural study on the impact of S239D/I332E mutations in the binding of Fc and FcγRIIIa. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 2021;26(6):985–92; doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-021-0024-2

19. Jebamani P, Sriramulu DK, Lee SG. Residue interaction network and molecular dynamics simulation study on the binding of S239D/I332E Fc variant with enhanced affinity to FcgammaRIIIa receptor. J Mol Graph Model 2023;118:108327; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2022.108327

20. Jebamani P, Lee SG. Study on the S239D/I332E mutation effect on the kinetics of Fc–Fc receptor binding through transition complex theory. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 2024;29(4):759–68; doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-024-00104-7

21. Kralj S, M. Hodoscek, B. Podobnik, T. Kunej, U. Bren, D. Janezic, et al. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal interactions of an IgG1 antibody with selected Fc receptors. Front Chem 2021;9:705931; doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.705931

22. Kutlu A, E. Capkin, K. Adacan,, M. Yuce. Fc-FcgammaRI Complexes: molecular dynamics simulations shed light on Ectodomain D3’s potential role in IgG binding. ACS Omega 2024;9(50):49272–82; doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c06318

23. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, et al. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28(1):235–42; doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.235

24. Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 1997;18(15):2714–23; doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150181505

25. Bekker H, Berendsen HJC, Dijkstra EJ, Achterop S, von Drunen R, van der Spoel D, et al. GROMACS: a parallel computer for molecular dynamics simulations. In: de Groot RA, Nadrchal J, editors. Physics Computing ‘92. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, pp 252–6, 1993.

26. Berendsen HJC, Van Der Spoel D, Van Drunen R. GROMACS: a message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput Phys Commun 1995;91(1-3):43–56; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-e

27. Abraham MJ, Murtola T, Schulz R, Páll S, Smith JC, Hess B, et al. GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 2015;1- 2(1-2):19–25; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001

28. MacKerell AD, Brooks B, Brooks CL, Nilsson L, Roux B, Won Y, et al. CHARMM: the Energy Function and Its Parameterization. In: Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry. 1998. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/0470845015.cfa007

29. Brooks BR, Brooks CL III, MacKerell AD Jr, Nilsson L, Petrella RJ, Roux B, et al. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 2009;30(10):1545–614; doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21287

30. Lee J, Cheng X, Swails JM, Yeom MS, Eastman PK, Lemkul JA, et al. CHARMM-GUI Input Generator for NAMD, GROMACS, AMBER, OpenMM, and CHARMM/OpenMM Simulations Using the CHARMM36 Additive Force Field. J Chem Theory Comput 2016;12(1):405–13; doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00935

31. Best RB, Zhu X, Shim J, Lopes PE, Mittal J, Feig M, et al. Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone phi, psi and side-chain chi(1) and chi(2) dihedral angles. J Chem Theory Comput 2012;8(9):3257–73; doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/ct300400x

32. Grant BJ, Rodrigues APC, Elsawy KM, McCammon JA, Caves LSD. Bio3d: an R package for the comparative analysis of protein structures. Bioinformatics 2006;22(21):2695–6; doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl461

33. Wirtz H, Schäfer S, Hoberg C, Reid KM, Leitner DM, Havenith M. Hydrophobic collapse of ubiquitin generates rapid protein-water motions. Biochemistry 2018;57(26):3650–7; doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00235

34. Alonso DO, Daggett V. Molecular dynamics simulations of hydrophobic collapse of ubiquitin. Protein Sci 1998;7(4):860–74; doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560070404

35. Van Coillie J, Schulz MA, Bentlage AEH, de Haan N, Ye Z, Geerdes DM, et al. Role of N-Glycosylation in FcgammaRIIIa interaction with IgG. Front Immunol 2022;13:987151; doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.987151

Article Metrics
Views Downloads 0 Total

Year

Month

Related Search

By author names

Similar Articles

In vitro studies of Asian medicinal plants with potential activity against breast cancer

Zaida Zakaria, Siew Hua Gan, Mahaneem Mohamed

Nyctanthes arbor-tristis: Comprehensive review on its pharmacological, antioxidant, and anticancer activities

Smita Parekh, Anjali Soni

Identification of highest L-Methioninase enzyme producers among soil microbial isolates, with potential antioxidant and anticancer properties

D. Kavya, Varalakshmi Kilingar Nadumane

Antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer activities of leaves extracts of Filicium decipiens

Atiyaparveen I Basarikatti, Sanjay Mishra, Vijaykumar Uppar, Basavaraj Padmashali

The comparative antimicrobial and anticancer of chemical extract from in vitro and in vivo Peperomia pellucida plantlet

Lydia Teoh, Nareshwaran Gnanasegaran, Ahmad Faris Mohd Adnan, Rosna Mat Taha

Anti-proliferative activities of solasodine extracts from different Solanum spp. cell cultures on colon and bone carcinoma cell lines

Vijaykumar Deshmukh,, Sangeeta Ballav, Soumya Basu, Sanjay Mishra,, Jyoti Deshpande, Minal Wani

The physicochemical and biological properties of novel silver nanoparticles synthesized by the extract of Holigarna ferruginea

Kumbar Mudakappa Manjunath, Y. L. Krishnamurthy

Purification and structural characterization of Chojalactone C, a promising anticancer compound from a marine bacterium, Paenibacillus lentimorbus SAGM 3

Nagamuthu Vinothkumar, Pachaiappan Pugalendhi

Identification of differential expressed genes and its related pathways in Hela cell line treated with urea noscapine as potent anticancer agent

Animesh Pattnaik, Pradeep Kumar Naik

In vitro anti-cancer potency of Mortierella elongata lipids against MCF 7 cells through induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest

S. Ida Poornima, V. Judia Harriet Sumathy

Assessment of in vitro antioxidant properties and anticancer potential of Cucumis pubescens Willd. a medicinal fruit, utilizing human lung cancer cell line (A549)

T. Sundari, R. Kavitha, B. Mythili Gnanamangai, S. Saranya

Exploring Bougainvillea glabra flowers: a promising source of natural antimicrobial and anticancer agents

Wanchat Sirisarn, Auemphon Mordmuang, Kankamol Kerdkumthong, Sompop Saeheng,,

Eco-friendly fabrication of silver nanoparticles from the red macroalga Scinaia moniliformis and evaluation of their biomedical activities

Hemangiben Sheth, Charumati Jha

Evaluation of the phytochemical constituents and tumor reduction potentials of Tragia involucrata Linn.

Madhuri Menon, Leyon Varghese

Leveraging monoclonal antibodies as therapeutics to address antimicrobial resistance in bacteria

Vaishali Verma

Technological advancement in the development of monoclonal antibody therapies: Present, past, and future

Harit Kasana,, Harish Chander, Ashwani Mathur