Novel hydrophobins Hydph6, Hydph7, and Hydph16 from Pleurotus ostreatus: In silico characterization reveals Hydph6 chitin affinity and industrial potential
Hydrophobins (HPs) are industrially important small surface-active proteins mostly found in fungi. In this study, new hydrophobins were detected and identified from the edible white rot mushroom Pleurotus ostreatus (GRAS strain) using a proteomic approach. HPs Hydph6, Hydph7, Hydph16, Vmh2, and Vmh3-1 were detected together after separation of the membrane proteins of P. ostreatus mycelia. Identification of Hydph6, Hydph7, and Hydph16 were reported for the 1st time in Orbitrap-HR-LC-MS/MS analysis, and the primary amino acid sequences were annotated. This study is the first report of protein-level identification and extensive in silico characterization of Hydph6, Hydph7, and Hydph16. Computational tools were used to characterize these selected HPs. ProtParam and ProtScale studies confirmed Vmh2 and Hydph6 as promising candidates for industrial applications with a high value of the grand average of hydropathicity index (0.662 and 0.996, respectively) and aliphatic index (112.11 and 122.07). Modeller 9.11 was used to obtain the most accurate three-dimensional structures of all HPs. Among all the proteins, the Z-score values and Ramachandran plot analysis of Vmh2 and Vmh3-1 suggested that the structures of these proteins were more closely aligned with existing databases of previously derived structures of HPs in comparison to other HPs. Protein– protein interaction studies showed promising interaction of Hydph6 and Vmh2 with most of the proteins involved in cell division and development, of P. ostreatus, in a way that these proteins play an important role in the growth cycle of P. ostreatus. These proteins did not show transmembrane regions and were not glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)- anchored. It was the first report to evaluate the role of HPs in the hydrophobicity and interaction with the cell membrane through docking studies. Results revealed that Hydph6 had a comparable docking score of −8.1 with Chitin, similar to the chitin-interacting proteins, Beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase (−7.9 Kcal/mol), Chitinase A1 (−8.5 Kcal/mol), and Chitin-Binding Protein 21 (−8.2 Kcal/mol). Out of the five studied HPs, Hydph6, and Vmh2 had shown important characteristics such as amphipathic nature, thermostability, flexibility, and interaction with membrane molecules. Computational analysis suggests the potential of Hydph6 and Vmh2 for industrial applications in surface modification, food foams, and drug delivery systems. Vmh2 is already under evaluation for various industrial applications. In a future study, Hydph6 will be isolated, characterized, and explored for industrial applications.
Kulkarni SS, Dani A, More A, Kudagi S, Turkar S. Novel hydrophobins Hydph6, Hydph7, and Hydph16 from Pleurotus ostreatus: In silico characterization reveals Hydph6 chitin affinity and industrial potential. J Appl Biol Biotech 2025. Article in Press. http://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2026.262732
1. Wösten HAB, De Vocht ML. Hydrophobins, the fungal coat unravelled. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Biomembr. 2000;1469(2):79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4157(00)00002-2
2. Whiteford JR, Spanu PD. Hydrophobins and the interactions between fungi and plants. Mol Plant Pathol. 2002;3(5):391-400. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1364-3703.2002.00129.x
3. Wu Y, Li J, Yang H, Shin HJ. Fungal and mushroom hydrophobins: A review. J Mushroom. 2017;15(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.14480/JM.2017.15.1.1
4. Han J, Kawauchi M, Terauchi Y, Tsuji K, Yoshimi A, Tanaka C, et al. Physiological function of hydrophobin Hydph16 in cell wall formation in agaricomycete Pleurotus ostreatus. Fungal Genet Biol. 2025;176:103943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2024.103943
5. Han J, Kawauchi M, Schiphof K, Terauchi Y, Yoshimi A, Tanaka C, et al. Features of disruption mutants of genes encoding for hydrophobin Vmh2 and Vmh3 in mycelial formation and resistance to environmental stress in Pleurotus ostreatus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2023;370:fnad036. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnad036
6. Xu D, Wang Y, Keerio AA, Ma A. Identification of hydrophobin genes and their physiological functions related to growth and development in Pleurotus ostreatus. Microbiol Res. 2021;247:126723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2021.126723
7. Peñas MM, Rust B, Larraya LM, Ramírez L, Pisabarro AG. Differentially regulated, vegetative-mycelium-specific hydrophobins of the edible basidiomycete Pleurotus ostreatus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(8):3891-8. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.8.3891-3898.2002
8. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227(5259):680-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0
9. Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol. 1982;157(1):105-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0
10. Kelley LA, Sternberg MJE. Protein structure prediction on the web: A case study using the Phyre server. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(3):363-73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.2
11. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(17):3389-3402. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
12. Shehadi IA, Rashdan HRM, Abdelmonsef AH. Homology modeling and virtual screening studies of antigen MLAA-42 protein: Identification of novel drug candidates against leukemia-an in silico approach. Comput Math Methods Med. 2020;2020:8196147. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8196147
13. Shi J, Blundell TL, Mizuguchi K. FUGUE: Sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J Mol Biol. 2001;310(1):243-57. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2001.4762
14. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ.CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22(22):4673-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
15. Webb B, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2016;54:5.6.1-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpbi.3
16. Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. PROCHECK: A program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr. 1993;26(2):283-91. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889892009944
17. Liu Y, Yang X, Gan J, Chen S, Xiao ZX, Cao Y. CB-Dock2: Improved protein-ligand blind docking by integrating cavity detection, docking and homologous template fitting. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(W1):W159-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac394
18. Trott O, Olson AJ.AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31(2):455-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21334
19. Armenante A, Longobardi S, Rea I, De Stefano L, Giocondo M, Silipo A, et al. The Pleurotus ostreatus hydrophobin Vmh2 and its interaction with glucans. Glycobiology. 2010;20(5):594-602. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwq009
20. Kulkarni SS, Nene SN, Joshi KS. Identification and characterization of a hydrophobin Vmh3 from Pleurotus ostreatus. Protein Expr Purif. 2022;195-6:106095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2022.106095
21. Nakazawa T, Kawauchi M, Otsuka Y, Han J, Koshi D, Schiphof K, et al. Pleurotus ostreatus as a model mushroom in genetics, cell biology, and material sciences. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024;108(1):1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-024-13034-4
22. De Vocht ML, Reviakine I, Ulrich WP, Bergsma-Schutter W, Wösten HAB, Vogel H, et al. Self-assembly of the hydrophobin SC3 proceeds via two structural intermediates. Protein Sci. 2002;11(5):1199. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.4540102
23. Bayry J, Aimanianda V, Guijarro JI, Sunde M, Latgé JP. Hydrophobins-unique fungal proteins. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(5):e1002700. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002700
24. Meister K, Bäumer A, Szilvay GR, Paananen A, Bakker HJ. Self-assembly and conformational changes of hydrophobin classes at the air-water interface. J Phys Chem Lett. 2016;7(20):4067-71. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01917
25. Rojas-Osnaya J, Quintana-Quirino M, Espinosa-Valencia A, Bravo AL, Nájera H. Hydrophobins: Multitask proteins. Front Phys. 2024;12:1393340. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2024.1393340
26. Salve AL, Apotikar SB, Muddebihalkar SV, Joshi KS, Kulkarni SS. Applications of hydrophobins in medical biotechnology. J Sci Res. 2022;66(3):86-94. https://doi.org/10.37398/jsr.2022.660312
27. Guruprasad K, Reddy BVB, Pandit MW. Correlation between stability of a protein and its dipeptide composition: A novel approach for predicting in vivo stability of a protein from its primary sequence. Protein Eng. 1990;4(2):155-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/4.2.155
28. Rafeeq CM, Vaishnav AB, Manzur Ali PP. Characterisation and comparative analysis of hydrophobin isolated from Pleurotus floridanus (PfH). Protein Express Purif. 2021;182:105834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2021.105834
29. Bouqellah NA, Farag PF. In silico evaluation, phylogenetic analysis, and structural modeling of the class II hydrophobin family from different fungal phytopathogens. Microorganisms. 2023;11(11):2632. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11112632
30. Mokhtari-Abpangoui M, Lohrasbi-Nejad A, Zolala J, Torkzadeh-Mahani M, Ghanbari S. Improvement thermal stability of d-lactate dehydrogenase by hydrophobin-1 and in silico prediction of protein-protein interactions. Mol Biotechnol. 2021;63(10):919-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-021-00342-7
31. Lohrasbi-Nejad A, Torkzadeh-Mahani M, Hosseinkhani S. Hydrophobin-1 promotes thermostability of firefly luciferase. FEBS J. 2016;283(13):2494-507. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.13757
32. Piscitelli A, Pennacchio A, Longobardi S, Velotta R, Giardina P. Vmh2 hydrophobin as a tool for the development of “self-immobilizing” enzymes for biosensing. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114(1):46-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26049
33. Valsecchi I, Dupres V, Stephen-Victor E, Guijarro JI, Gibbons J, Beau R, et al. Role of Hydrophobins in Aspergillus fumigatus. J Fungi. 2018;4(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4010002
34. Utterström J, Naeimipour S, Selegård R, Aili D. Coiled coil-based therapeutics and drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;170:26-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2020.12.012
35. Janssen MI, Van Leeuwen MBM, Van Kooten TG, De Vries J, Dijkhuizen L, Wösten HAB. Promotion of fibroblast activity by coating with hydrophobins in the β-sheet end state. Biomaterials. 2004;25(14):2731-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.060
36. Larraya LM, Idareta E, Arana D, Ritter E, Pisabarro AG, Ramírez L. Quantitative trait loci controlling vegetative growth rate in the edible basidiomycete Pleurotus ostreatus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(3):1109-14. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.3.1109-1114.2002
37. Gupta CL, Akhtar S, Bajpai P. In silico protein modeling: Possibilities and limitations. EXCLI J. 2014;13:513-5.
Year
Month
Substrate optimization for cultivation of Pleurotus ostreatus on lignocellulosic wastes (coffee, sawdust, and sugarcane bagasse) in Mizan–Tepi University, Tepi Campus, Tepi Town
Dagnew Bitew Tarko, Abel Mandefro SirnaEffect of perforation size and substrate bag fruiting position on the morphology of fruiting bodies and clusters in Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq.) P. Kumm
Iryna Bandura, Omoanghe S. Isikhuemhen, Alina Kulik, Marina Serdiuk, Olena Sucharenko, Valentina Jukova, Viktoriia Koliadenko, Nona GaprindashviliFortification of soy milk with prebiotic natural ß-glucan derived from edible mushrooms Pleurotus ostreatus and Agaricus bisporus
Kumaresan Kuppamuthu, Swathi Gopalakrishnan, Raghuvandhanan K. Sivasamy, Thirumurugan Alagu, Sathishkumar ThiyagarajanA dualistic approach to investigate the remedial potential and edible property of Pleurotus ostreatus on hydrocarbon-contaminated soil
Arunkumar Dhailappan, Anitha Arumugam, Gugaprakash Rajendran, Mukesh RavichandranAnalysis of Dynamics of Proteome in Resistant Cultivar of Pearl Millet Seedlings during Sclerospora graminicola Infection
Chandra Pal Anup, Kukkundoor Ramachandra KiniIdentification and in-silico characterization of differentially expressed salt-induced proteins in the leaves of mangrove grass Myriostachya wightiana
Mathikani Kiran Kumar, B V Sandeep, Pola SudhakarComputational-based approaches in epigenetic research: Insights from computational tools, mathematical models, and machine learning methods
Roghayeh Ghorbani, Reza Shokri-GhareloBioinformatics analysis reveals PIH1D1 as an important prognostic marker in breast cancer
Dhiraj Kumar Singh, Bimal Jit, Rashmi Gupta, Amit Kumar Verma, Riyaz Ahmad Mir