Short Communication | Volume 14, Supplement 1, May, 2026
Bioprospecting for protease-producing bacteria in mangrove ecosystems: Screening, isolation, and application studies
Proteases constitute an important group of enzymes widely utilised in industrial processes due to their versatility for various applications. These applications range from their use in textiles and detergents to food processing and pharmaceuticals. Recently, bacterial proteases have garnered considerable attention for commercial applications. This interest stems from their ease of cultivation, simplicity in genetic modification, and low production costs, making them highly useful for commercial purposes. The unique conditions of mangrove soils harbour microorganisms that can produce enzymes and metabolites with valuable industrial properties that are less explored. In this study, bacterial strains were isolated from soil samples taken from the Pichavaram mangrove forest, Tamil Nadu, India, and screened for their ability to produce protease. Among those tested, one isolate (C2) showed the highest protease production after 96 h of incubation, achieving 633.14 U/mL crude enzyme (total enzyme activity). The isolate C2 was further characterized using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, which confirmed it as Fictibacillus phosphorivorans. In addition to measuring protease activity, this work assessed the effectiveness of crude enzyme in removing blood stains and its ability to break down keratin, which suggests potential uses in feather degradation and waste management. Mangrove ecosystems harbor highly diverse microorganisms adapted to extreme and fluctuating conditions, such as salinity, tidal changes, and oxygen limitation. The high organic matter content in mangrove sediments promotes the microbial production of extracellular proteases, facilitating nutrient cycling. These environmental pressures drive the evolution of proteases with enhanced stability and unique catalytic properties, making mangroves promising hotspots for novel protease-producing microbes. Overall, this research emphasizes the potential of bacteria found in mangrove environments as sources of important industrial enzymes. It also highlights the need to explore different ecological niches to find new microbial resources for biotechnological advancements.
Kumar N, Umesh M. Bioprospecting for protease-producing bacteria in mangrove ecosystems: Screening, isolation, and application studies. J Appl Biol Biotech 2026;14(2):107-113. http://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2026.271964
1. Afrin S, Tamanna T, Shahajadi UF, Bhowmik B, Jui AH, Miah AS, et al. Characterization of protease-producing bacteria from garden soil and antagonistic activity against pathogenic bacteria. Microbe. 2024;4:100123. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.microb.2024.100123
2. Prihanto AA, Muyasyaroh H, Jaziri AA, Umam NI. Isolation and molecular characterization of gelatinase-producing bacteria from mangrove sediment. Biog J Ilm Biol. 2020;8(1):10-4. doi: http://doi.org/10.24252/bio.v8i1.10826
3. Razzaq A, Shamsi S, Ali A, Ali Q, Sajjad M, Malik A, et al. Microbial proteases applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:110. doi: http://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00110
4. Castro RA, Quecine MC, Lacava PT, Batista BD, Luvizotto DM, Marcon J, et al. Isolation and enzyme bioprospection of endophytic bacteria associated with plants of Brazilian mangrove ecosystem. Springerplus. 2014;3(1):382. doi: http://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801- 3-382
5. Mishra RR, Swain MR, Dangar TK, Thatoi H. Diversity and seasonal fluctuation of predominant microbial communities in Bhitarkanika, a tropical mangrove ecosystem in India. Rev Biol Trop. 2012;60(2):909- 24. doi: http://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v60i2.4026
6. Liu R, Zhao S, Zhang B, Li G, Fu X, Yan P, et al. Biodegradation of polystyrene (PS) by marine bacteria in mangrove ecosystem. J Hazard Mater. 2023;442:130056. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130056
7. Palit K, Rath S, Chatterjee S, Das S. Microbial diversity and ecological interactions of microorganisms in the mangrove ecosystem: Threats, vulnerability, and adaptations. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022;29:32467-512. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19048-7
8. Thatoi H, Behera BC, Mishra RR, Dutta SK. Biodiversity and biotechnological potential of microorganisms from mangrove ecosystems: A review. Ann Microbiol. 2013;63(1):1-19. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-012-0442-7
9. Sebastian CD, Kutty S. Identification and phylogeny of potential bacteria isolated from mangroves of Kadalundi, Kerala, India. J Mar Biol Assoc India. 2020;62:139-42. doi: http://doi.org/10.6024/jmbai.2020.62.2.2152-0x
10. Sharma AK, Sharma V, Saxena J, Yadav B, Alam A, Prakash A. Isolation and screening of extracellular protease enzyme from fungal isolates of soil. Int J Sci Res Environ Sci. 2015;3(9):334-40. doi: http://doi.org/10.12983/ijsres-2015-p0334-0340
11. Abdel-Aziz SH, Ibrahim AM, Guirgis AA, Dawwam GE, Elsababty ZE. Isolation and screening of cellulase producing bacteria isolated from soil. Benha J Appl Sci. 2021;6(3):207-13. doi: http://doi.org/10.21608/bjas.2021.188849
12. Thomas NN, Archana V, Shibina S, Edwin BT. Isolation and characterization of a protease from Bacillus spp. Mater Today Proc. 2021;41:685-91. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.435
13. Cupp-Enyard C. Sigma’s non-specific protease activity assay - casein as a substrate. J Vis Exp. 2008;19:899. doi: http://doi.org/10.3791/899
14. Suresh S, Umesh M, Nag A, James N, Santhosh AS, Stanly LM. Bioprospecting of fish scale waste as a cost effective substrate for crude protease production using Stenotrophomonas koreensis SH32 and its multifunctional applications: A sustainable strategy for circular bioeconomy. Biomass Bioener. 2025;197:107811. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107811
15. Stanly LM, Umesh M. Effect of chicken feather hydrolysate on growth of spinach through soil amendment method: Unraveling a potential liquid biofertilizer. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2024;18(3):2085-94. doi: http://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.18.3.58
16. Peng Z, Mao X, Zhang J, Du G, Chen J.Effective biodegradation of chicken feather waste by co-cultivation of keratinase producing strains. Microb Cell Fact. 2019;18(1):84. doi: http://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-019-1134-9
17. Sharma K, Kumar R, Vats S, Gupta A. Production, partial purification and characterization of alkaline protease from Bacillus aryabhattai K3. Int J Adv Pharm Biol Chem. 2014;3:290-8.
18. Sun B, Zou K, Zhao Y, Tang Y, Zhang F, Chen W, et al. The fermentation optimization for alkaline protease production by Bacillus subtilis BS-QR-052. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1301065. doi: http://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1301065
19. Feyissa BH. Screening, Identification, and Optimization of Protease Producing Bacillus pumilus Strain DT-15 From Tannery Waste Disposal Site in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Microbiol. 2025;2025(1):7176092. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/ijm/7176092
20. Alongi DM. Carbon cycling and storage in mangrove forests. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2014;6:195-219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135020
21. Gupta R, Beg QK, Lorenz P. Bacterial alkaline proteases: Molecular approaches and industrial applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;59(1):15-32. doi: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00253-002-0975-y
22. Glaeser SP, Dott W, Busse HJ, Kämpfer P. Fictibacillus phosphorivorans gen. Nov., sp. Nov. and proposal to reclassify Bacillus arsenicus, Bacillus barbaricus, Bacillus macauensis, Bacillus nanhaiensis, Bacillus rigui, Bacillus solisalsi and Bacillus gelatini in the genus Fictibacillus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63(8):2934-44. doi: http://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.049171-0
23. Tian L, Te Chuan L, Selimin MA. Effect of Protease in Commercialized Detergent Powder on Blood Removal Efficiency. In: Research in Management of Technology and Business; 2022. doi: http://doi.org/10.30880/rmtb.2022.03.01.019
24. Ibrahim NA, Ibrahim N, Lizawardi NS, Fauzi NF, Al-Amsyar SM. Production and application of thermostable protease 50a as liquid protein stain remover. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2020;596(1):012012. doi: http://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/596/1/012012
25. Vishalakshi N, Lingappa K, Amena S, Prabhakar M, Dayanand A. Production of Alkaline Protease from Streptomyces gulbargensis and its Application in Removal of Blood Stains; 2009. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/production-of-alkaline-protease-from-streptomyces-vishalakshi-lingappa/2100d1290b2d4900e26d41cc67115bd080e877cb [Last accessed on 2025 Nov 03].
26. Keshapaga UR, Jathoth K, Singh SS, Gogada R, Burgula S. Characterization of high-yield Bacillus subtilis cysteine protease for diverse industrial applications. Braz J Microbiol. 2023;54(2):739-52. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-023-00992-6
27. Elaine Mankge M, Penistacia Maela M, Mark Abrahams A, Hope Serepa-Dlamini M. Screening of Bacillus spp. Bacterial endophytes for protease production, and application in feather degradation and bio-detergent additive. Heliyon. 2024;10(9):e30736. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30736
28. Babbar N, Sharma G, Arya SK. Effective degradation of chicken feather waste by keratinase enzyme with triton X-100 additive. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2022;44:102447. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2022.102447
29. Admasie TZ, Biadglegne F, Abda EM. Alkaline keratinase from Bacillus sp. DRS4 efficiently biodegrades chicken feathers to synthesize improved keratin/bacterial nanocellulose-based bioplastics. Heliyon. 2024;10(12):e32768. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32768
30. Riaz A, Muzzamal H, Maqsood B, Naz S, Latif F, Saleem M. Characterization of a bacterial keratinolytic protease for effective degradation of chicken feather waste into feather protein hydrolysates. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2024;16(3):22. doi: http://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbe1603022
31. Bhari R, Kaur M, Sarup Singh R. Chicken feather waste hydrolysate as a superior biofertilizer in agroindustry. Curr Microbiol 2021;78(6):2212-30. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-021-02491-z
32. De Menezes CL, Boscolo M, Da Silva R, Gomes E, Da Silva RR. The degradation of chicken feathers by Ochrobactrum intermedium results in antioxidant and metal chelating hydrolysates and proteolytic enzymes for staphylococcal biofilm dispersion. 3 Biotech. 2023;13(6):202. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-023-03619-7
33. Cui C, Sun L, Chen X, Zhu Y, Zheng Z, Mao D, et al. Improving the biodegradation of chicken feathers by a Bacillus licheniformis ZSZ6 mutant and application of hydrolysate. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2023;180:105597. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2023.105597
34. Yadav S, Khosla B. Biodegradation of poultry feather waste by keratinase producing Bacillus cereus strain isolated from poultry farms waste disposal site. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng. 2021;4:100114. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2021.100114
35. Jagadeesan Y, Meenakshisundaram S, Saravanan V, Balaiah A. Sustainable production, biochemical and molecular characterization of thermo-and-solvent stable alkaline serine keratinase from novel Bacillus pumilus AR57 for promising poultry solid waste management. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;163:135-46. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.219
Year
Month