Assessment of agronomic trait and tolerance indices on yield parameters in eight barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) accessions under salt stress

Rajeswari Somasundaram; A. Somasundaram

doi:10.7324/JABB.2023.39505

Abstract References Article Metrics Similar Articles Request Permission Related Search Citation Alert By Google Scholar Comment On This Article

Abstract

Analysing the salt tolerance indexes (mean productivity [MP], geometric MP [GMP], stress tolerance index [STI], stress stability index [SSI], tolerance index [TOL], yield index [YI], and yield stability index [YSI]) on productivity on salt stress are one of the best ways to identify naturally existing variant in the crop accessions. Eight USDA barley accessions (Kindred, Morex, ELS 6302-5, NB 5, MOR 7 / 5, seco, 334 and 1532) were investigated the effect of salt stress at 10 dSm−1 on yield parameter compared to non-stressed crops. On grain maturity dry weight, number of leaves, number of tillers, total plant height, number of sterile, and fertile tillers, and number of grains in each plant were recorded. In the leaf and leaf sheath, mineral ions such as sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) were estimated using inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectroscopy. The stem and leaf parts were explored for their calorific value using a bomb calorimeter. Yield under stress showed positive correlations with GMP and STI than TOL, SSI, and YSI based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis. Based on the analysis Kindred, ELS 6302-5, NB 5, and 334 accessions show salt stress tolerance. The salt tolerance accessions are naturally existing high-yielding ones. Hence, that can be recommended for cultivation on the farmland affected by salinity.

Keyword: Agronomic trait Barley Cluster analysis Grain yield Principal component Salt tolerance index

Citation:

Somasundaram R, Somasundaram A. Assessment of agronomic trait and tolerance indices on yield parameters in eight barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) accessions under salt stress. J App Biol Biotech. 2023;11(2):268-273. https://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2023.39505

Copyright: Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license.

HTML Full Text

Reference

1. Shrivastava P, Kumar R. Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J Biol Sci 2015;22:123-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.001
2. Flowers TJ. Improving crop salt tolerance. J Exp Bot 2004;55:307-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh003
3. Machado RM, Serralheiro RP. Soil salinity: Effect on vegetable crop growth. management practices to prevent and mitigate soil salinization. Horticulturae 2017;3:30. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae3020030
4. Bartels D, Sunkar D. Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2005;24:23-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680590910410
5. IGC; 2015. Available from: http://www.igc.int/en/downloads/grainsupdate/IGC_5yearprojections2015.pdf [Last accessed on 2017 Feb 03].
6. Ponnamieruma PN. Role of cultivars tolerance in increasing rice production on saline land. In: Staples RC, Toenniessen, GH, editors. Salinity Tolerance in Plants Strategies for Crop Improvement. New York: Wiley; 1984. p. 255-71.
7. Pourkheirandish M, Komatsuda T. The importance of barley genetics and domestication in a global perspective. Ann Bot 2007;100:999-1008. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm139
8. Clarke JM, DePauw RM, Townley-Smith TF. Evaluation of methods for quantification of drought tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci 1992;32:723-28. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200030029x
9. Fernandez GC. Effective Selection Criteria for Assessing Stress Tolerance, International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress. Tainan, Shanhua: AVRDC; 1992. p. 257-70.
10. Mohammadi SA, Prasanna BM. Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants-Salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Sci 2003;43:1234-48. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.1235
11. Anwar J, Subhani GM, Hussain M, Ahmad J, Hussain M, Munir M. Drought tolerance indices and their correlation with yield in exotic wheat genotypes. Pak J Bot 2011;43:1527-30.
12. Bouslama M, Schapaugh WT. Stress tolerance in soybean. Part. 1: Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Sci 1984;24:933-7. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400050026x
13. Gavuzzi P, Rizza F, Palumbo M, Campaline RG, Ricciardi GL, Borghi B. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Can J Plant Sci 1997;77:523-31. https://doi.org/10.4141/P96-130
14. Fischer RA, Maurer R. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars: I. Grain yield responses. Aust J Agric Res 1978;29:897-912. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897
15. Rosielle AA, Hamblin J. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non- stress environment. Crop Sci 1981;21:943-46. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x
16. Johnson RA. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 6th ed. USA: Prentice-Hall; 2007.
17. Demidchik V, Maathuis FJ. Physiological roles of nonselective cation channels in plants: From salt stress to signalling and development. New Phytol 2007;175:387-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02128.x
18. Bansal KC, Sinha SK. Assessment of drought resistance in 20 genotypes of Triticum aestivum and related species total dry matter and grain yield stability. Euphytica 1991;56:7-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041738
19. Zubair M, Ajmal SU, Haqqani M. Multivariate analysis for quantitative traits in mungbean [Vigna radiate (L.) Wilczek]. Pak J Bot 2007;39:103-13.
20. Jaynes DB, Kaspar TC, Colvin TS, James DE. Cluster analysis of spatiotemporal corn yield pattern in an Iowa field. Agron J 2003;95:574-86. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.5740
21. Yara UK Limited; 2011. Available from: http://www.yara.co.uk/crop-nutrition/crops/barley/key-facts/world-production [Last accessed on 2017 Jan 27].
22. Aharizad S, Sabzi M, Mohammadi SA, Khodadadi E. Multivariate analysis of genetic diversity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) recombinant inbred lines using agronomic traits. Ann Biol Res 2012;3:2118-26. 23. Ali Yi, Atta BM, Akhter J, Monneveux P, Lateef Z. Genetic variability, association and diversity studies in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm. Pak J Bot 2008;40:2087-97.
24. Food and Agriculture Organization. World Agriculture Towards 2030 / 2050 Interim Report. Rome, Italy: Global Perspective Studies Unit, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2006.
25. Majidi MM, Mirlohi A, Amini F. Genetic variation, heritability and correlations of agro-morphological traits in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb). Euphytica 2009;167:323-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-9887-6
26. SPSS Inc. SPSS for Windows. Release 22.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc; 2007

Article Metrics

68 Views 70 Downloads 138 Total

Year

Month

Related Search

By author names

Somasundaram R [PubMed] [Google Scholar ]

A S [PubMed] [Google Scholar ]

By article title

1. Shrivastava P, Kumar R. Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J Biol Sci 2015;22:123-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.001

2. Flowers TJ. Improving crop salt tolerance. J Exp Bot 2004;55:307-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh003

3. Machado RM, Serralheiro RP. Soil salinity: Effect on vegetable crop growth. management practices to prevent and mitigate soil salinization. Horticulturae 2017;3:30. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae3020030

4. Bartels D, Sunkar D. Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2005;24:23-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680590910410

5. IGC; 2015. Available from: http://www.igc.int/en/downloads/grainsupdate/IGC_5yearprojections2015.pdf [Last accessed on 2017 Feb 03].

6. Ponnamieruma PN. Role of cultivars tolerance in increasing rice production on saline land. In: Staples RC, Toenniessen, GH, editors. Salinity Tolerance in Plants Strategies for Crop Improvement. New York: Wiley; 1984. p. 255-71.

7. Pourkheirandish M, Komatsuda T. The importance of barley genetics and domestication in a global perspective. Ann Bot 2007;100:999-1008. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm139

8. Clarke JM, DePauw RM, Townley-Smith TF. Evaluation of methods for quantification of drought tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci 1992;32:723-28. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200030029x

9. Fernandez GC. Effective Selection Criteria for Assessing Stress Tolerance, International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress. Tainan, Shanhua: AVRDC; 1992. p. 257-70.

10. Mohammadi SA, Prasanna BM. Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants-Salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Sci 2003;43:1234-48. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.1235

11. Anwar J, Subhani GM, Hussain M, Ahmad J, Hussain M, Munir M. Drought tolerance indices and their correlation with yield in exotic wheat genotypes. Pak J Bot 2011;43:1527-30.

12. Bouslama M, Schapaugh WT. Stress tolerance in soybean. Part. 1: Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Sci 1984;24:933-7. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400050026x

13. Gavuzzi P, Rizza F, Palumbo M, Campaline RG, Ricciardi GL, Borghi B. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Can J Plant Sci 1997;77:523-31. https://doi.org/10.4141/P96-130

14. Fischer RA, Maurer R. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars: I. Grain yield responses. Aust J Agric Res 1978;29:897-912. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897

15. Rosielle AA, Hamblin J. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non- stress environment. Crop Sci 1981;21:943-46. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x

16. Johnson RA. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 6th ed. USA: Prentice-Hall; 2007.

17. Demidchik V, Maathuis FJ. Physiological roles of nonselective cation channels in plants: From salt stress to signalling and development. New Phytol 2007;175:387-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02128.x

18. Bansal KC, Sinha SK. Assessment of drought resistance in 20 genotypes of Triticum aestivum and related species total dry matter and grain yield stability. Euphytica 1991;56:7-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041738

19. Zubair M, Ajmal SU, Haqqani M. Multivariate analysis for quantitative traits in mungbean [Vigna radiate (L.) Wilczek]. Pak J Bot 2007;39:103-13.

20. Jaynes DB, Kaspar TC, Colvin TS, James DE. Cluster analysis of spatiotemporal corn yield pattern in an Iowa field. Agron J 2003;95:574-86. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.5740

21. Yara UK Limited; 2011. Available from: http://www.yara.co.uk/crop-nutrition/crops/barley/key-facts/world-production [Last accessed on 2017 Jan 27].

22. Aharizad S, Sabzi M, Mohammadi SA, Khodadadi E. Multivariate analysis of genetic diversity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) recombinant inbred lines using agronomic traits. Ann Biol Res 2012;3:2118-26. 23. Ali Yi, Atta BM, Akhter J, Monneveux P, Lateef Z. Genetic variability, association and diversity studies in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm. Pak J Bot 2008;40:2087-97.

24. Food and Agriculture Organization. World Agriculture Towards 2030 / 2050 Interim Report. Rome, Italy: Global Perspective Studies Unit, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2006.

25. Majidi MM, Mirlohi A, Amini F. Genetic variation, heritability and correlations of agro-morphological traits in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb). Euphytica 2009;167:323-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-9887-6

26. SPSS Inc. SPSS for Windows. Release 22.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc; 2007