Research Article | Volume 11, Issue 1, January, 2023

Evaluation of seven different wheat cultivars for their resistance to drought in terms of growth indicators and yield

Zeyad H. AL-Fatlawi Ali Nadhim Farhood Saleh Abed Alwahed Mahdi Auday Hamid Taha Al-Tmime   

Open Access   

Published:  Nov 22, 2022

DOI: 10.7324/JABB.2023.110126
Abstract

The study used a randomized complete block design with three replicates to investigate drought tolerance genes and wheat growth and yield. The experiment included seven wheat cultivars: Buhooth 158, Rasheed, Buhooth 22, Tahade, Fatih, N70, and Cimmyt 72 in main plots and three drought treatments: Irrigation after draining 50% of available water (D1), irrigation after draining 65% of available water (D2), and irrigation after draining 75% of available water (D3) in subplots. Drought treatments resulted in an increase in the expression of genes that promote drought resistance. It is also noted that the Buhooth 158 cultivar was superior by giving the highest relative expression of LOC100382183 and LOC103630223 gene, with averages of 2.41 and 2.25 times higher than the rest of the cultivars, and this leads us to think that the Buhooth 158 cultivar has a higher drought tolerance than the rest of the cultivars. It was found that the drought treatment (D3) had a significant impact on plant height and flag leaf area, as well as on the number of tillers, spikes, and grains in a spike. The decreases in these indicators were 12.76% for plant height, 25.89% for flag leaf area; 44.00% for tillers number; 49.31% for spike number; 40.00% for grain number; and 32.21% for the weight of 1000 grains, 43.55% for grain yield, 4.91% for biological yield, and 40.44% for harvest index. Cultivars Buhooth158, Rasheed, and Buhooth 22 surpassed the rest, with the highest average yield components, grain yield, biological yield, and harvest index all indicating their superior performance.


Keyword:     Gene expression Polymerase chain reaction Wheat Grain yield Biological yield Harvest index Water stress


Citation:

AL-Fatlawi ZH, Farhood AN, Mahdi SAA, Al-Tmime AHT. Evaluation of seven different wheat cultivars for their resistance to drought in terms of growth indicators and yield. J App Biol Biotech. 2023;11(1):188-194. https://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2023.110126

Copyright: Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license.

HTML Full Text
Reference

1. Sallam A, Alqudah AM, Dawood MF, Baenziger PS, Börner A. Drought stress tolerance in wheat and barley: Advances in physiology, breeding and genetics research. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:3137. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133137

2. Guo R, Shi L, Jiao Y, Li M, Zhong X, Gu F, et al. Metabolic responses to drought stress in the tissues of drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive wheat genotype seedlings. AoB Plants 2018;10:ply016. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/ply016

3. Itam M, Mega R, Tadano S, Abdelrahman M, Matsunaga S, Yamasaki Y, et al. Metabolic and physiological responses to progressive drought stress in bread wheat. Sci Rep 2020;10:17189. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74303-6

4. Chaichi M, Sanjarian F, Razavi K, Gonzalez-Hernandez JL. Analysis of transcriptional responses in root tissue of bread wheat landrace (Triticum aestivum L.) reveals drought avoidance mechanisms under water scarcity. PLoS One 2010;14:e0212671. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212671

5. Luna CM, Pastori GM, Driscoll S, Groten K, Bernard S, Foyer CH. Drought controls on H2O2 accumulation, catalase (CAT) activity and CAT gene expression in wheat. J Exp Bot 2005;56:417-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri039

6. Hou J, Huang X, Sun W, Du C, Wang C, Xie Y, et al. Accumulation of water-soluble carbohydrates and gene expression in wheat stems correlates with drought resistance. J Plant Physiol 2018;231:182-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2018.09.017

7. Khan S, Anwar S, Yu S, Sun M, Yang Z, Gao ZQ. Development of drought-tolerant transgenic wheat: Achievements and limitations. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:3350. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133350

8. Bi H, Miao J, He J, Chen Q, Qian J, Li H, et al. Characterization of the wheat heat shock factor TaHsfA2e-5D conferring heat and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:2784. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052784

9. Yang Y, Al-Baidhani HH, Harris J, Riboni M, Li Y, Mazonka I, et al. DREB/CBF expression in wheat and barley using the stress-inducible promoters of HD-Zip I genes: Impact on plant development, stress tolerance and yield. Plant Biotechnol J 2020;18:829-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13252

10. Wang H, Zhu Y, Yuan P, Song S, Dong T, Chen P, et al. Response of wheat DREB transcription factor to osmotic stress based on DNA methylation. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:7670. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147670

11. Marcek T, Hamow KÁ, Végh B, Janda T, Darko E. Metabolic response to drought in six winter wheat genotypes. PLoS One 2019;14:e0212411. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212411

12. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 2022;25:402-8. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262

13. Zenda T, Liu S, Wang X, Liu G, Jin H, Dong A, et al. Key maize drought-responsive genes and pathways revealed by comparative transcriptome and physiological analyses of contrasting inbred lines. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:1268. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20061268

14. Abid M, Ali S, Qi LK, Zahoor R, Tian Z, Jiang D, et al. Physiological and biochemical changes during drought and recovery periods at tillering and jointing stages in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sci Rep 2018;8:4615. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21441-7

15. Qaseem MF, Qureshi R, Shaheen H. Effects of pre-anthesis drought, heat and their combination on the growth, yield and physiology of diverse wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes varying in sensitivity to heat and drought stress. Sci Rep 2019;9:6955. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43477-z

16. Farhood AN, Merza NA, Shukan MM, Mohammed AA, Taha, AH. Role of plant growth regulators in gene expression of SGR gene responsible for stay green of wheat varieties. Syst Rev Pharm 2020;11:1111-20.

17. Yadav AK, Carroll AJ, Estavillo GM, Rebetzke GJ, Pogson BJ. Wheat drought tolerance in the field is predicted by amino acid responses toglasshouse-imposed drought. J Exp Bot 2019;70:4931-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz224

18. Senapati N, Stratonovitch P, Paul MJ, Semenov MA. Drought tolerance during reproductive development is important for increasing wheat yield potential under climate change in Europe. J Exp Bot 2019;70:2549-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery226

Article Metrics

0 Absract views 12 PDF Downloads 12 Total views

Related Search

By author names

Citiaion Alert By Google Scholar


Similar Articles

Isolation and in silico characterization of full-length cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase gene involved in lignin biosynthesis in Neolamarckia cadamba

Boon-Ling Tchin, Wei-Seng Ho, Shek-Ling Pang

Rapid and sensitive method for detection of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin genes in milk sample

Mahantesh M Kurjogi, Basappa B Kaliwal

Simplified detection of the asymmetric polymerase chain reaction-amplified DNA and its application in the target identification

G Suhasa, Savithri Bhat

Biosynthesis of biodegradable polymer by a potent soil bacterium from a stress-prone environment

Ningthoujam Chandani, Pranab Behari Mazumder, Amitabh Bhattacharjee

Enhancement of pigment production potential of Serratia marcescens (GBB151) through mutation and random amplified polymorphic deoxyribonucleic acid analysis of its mutants

Cecilia Nireti Fakorede, Babamotemi Oluwasola Itakorode, Olu Odeyemi, Gbolahan Babalola

Development and validation of multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for concomitant detection of genus Staphylococcus and clinically relevant methicillin resistance determinants

Nimita Venugopal, Feroze Ganaie, Susweta Mitra, Rituparna Tewari, Tushar K. Dey, Rakshith Ojha, Rajeswari Shome, Bibek R. Shome

Expression of FUB-1 and FUB-11 as Toxic genes responsible for virulence during pathogenesis and combination of biocontrol agents in inhibition of Fusaric acid of Fusarium oxysporum causing Fusarium wilt of Arachis hypogaea L.

Pilli Rajeswari

Effect of nutrient media enhanced with plant growth regulators on genetic stability in sub-cultures of Digitalis purpurea callus

Mohammed Ahmed AL-Oqab, Salim Zaid, Youssef Al-Ammouri, Shawqi H. Alawdi

Begomovirus detection in the whitefly Bemisia spp. on eggplant Solanum melongena L. leaves

Rachmi Putri, Prasetya Anugerah Gusti, Nastiti Wijayanti

Identification, evaluation and optimization of a minimum simple sequence repeat marker set for triticale breeding

W.C. Botes and D. Bitalo

Changes in chromatin active fraction of germinating seedlings of wheat under the effect of EMI EHF

P.O. Vardevanyan,M.A. Parsadanyan,M.A. Shahinyan,M.R. Darbinyan

An insight into wheat haploid production using wheat x maize wide hybridization

Anjanabha Bhattacharya, Bhavesh Palan, Bharat Char

Beneficial effects of soaking and germination on nutritional quality and bioactive compounds of biofortified wheat derivatives

Meena Verma, Vinod Kumar, Imran Sheikh, Punesh Sangwan, Roop Singh Bora, Ajar Nath Yadav, Harcharan Singh Dhaliwal