Published:  Feb 25, 2014
Salmonella is still a global concern of the food and livestock industries. We evaluated environmental influences and farm practices on rate of Salmonella feed and water contamination in selected commercial poultry farms in Zaria. A total of 188 feed samples were collected from randomly selected feed sales outlets and poultry farms using sterile polyethene bags. 94 water samples from primary water sources, reservoirs and drinkers in the poultry farms were collected using sterile universal bottles. Samples were cultured using selective isolation method with prior enrichment. Suspected isolates were identified and characterized using conventional biochemical methods. Eight each of water and feed samples were positive for Salmonella. Husbandry systems, hygienic practices, presence of rodents and other environmental factors on the isolation rates of Salmonella from samples were correlated. All Salmonella isolates were from flocks on deep litter, three Salmonella isolates were from commercial and five from self milled feeds on-farm. Isolated Salmonella organisms showed highest susceptibility to ciprofloxacin but resistant to commonly used antibiotics. Feed, water, rodents and unhygienic practices are important means of multi-drug resistant Salmonella dissemination; they may also serve as critical control points for Salmonella in to poultry flocks.
MUSA, I.W., MANSUR, M.S., SA’IDU, L., MOHAMMED, B and ALIYU, H.B. Poultry Environment and farm Practices Influencing the Isolation rate of Multi-Drug Resistant Salomnella from water and Poultry feed in Zaria, Nigeria. J App Biol Biotech. 2014; 2 (01): 013-016.
1. F. Sheick. Problems faced by small scale poultry farmers in developing countries. World Poultry. 2012, available www.Worldpoultry.net.
2. K. Ronald. Experimental vaccine to safeguard against fowl typhoid. World Poultry. 2013 available www.Worldpoultry.net.
3. H.M, Al-nakhli., A, Al-ogaily., T. J, Nassar. Reports of Salmonella serovars isolated from poultry and poultry environment in Saudi Arabia. Review Science Technical Office International des Epizootics. 1999, (18): 700-709, 1999.
4. A, Ricardo, and S. Brazil. Salmonella special reducing risks of Salmonella infections in poultry. World Poultry. 2012 avaialble www.Worldpoultry.net.
5. N. Roth, The use of acidifiers in controlling Salmonella. World Poultry. 2012, available from www.Worldpoultry.net, 2012
6. B.G, Meerburg, A, Kijlstra. The role of rodents in the transmission of Salmonella and Campylobacter. Journal of Science Food and Agriculture. 2007, (87): 2774-2781.
7. O.O, Bale., A.A, Sekoni., C.N, Kwanashie. A case study of possible health hazards associated with poultry houses. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production. 2002, (29): 102-111.
8. S.S, Ibe. An introduction to genetics and animal breeding in Nigeria. Longman Publisher. 1998.
9. I.C, Okoli. Studies on antimicrobial resistance among E.coli isolates from feeds and poultry production units. PhD Thesis, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria. 2008.
10. C, Wray., R.H, Dvies, J.D, Cockish. Enterobacteriaceae. In: F.T.W. Jordan and M. Pattison (eds). Poultry diseases. 1999.
11. D.J, Henzier., H.M, Optizt. The role of mice in the epizootology of Salmonella enteritidis infections on chicken layer farmers. Avian Diseases. 1992, (36): 625-1631.
12. B, Brandenburg. The animal health surveillance system and avian influenza in Nigeria. Early detection, reporting and surveillance-avian influenza in Africa (EDRS) Project. 2008.
13. A.W, Bauer., W.M Kirby., J.C, Sherris, and M, Turck. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by standardized single disk method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1996, (45): 493-496.
14. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Sixth informational supplement document, Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA; 2006.
15. Sainsbury, D. Poultry health and management. 4th edn. Blackwell Publishers, Cowley road, Oxford; 2002.
572 Absract views 167 PDF Downloads 739 Total views