Published:  Mar 20, 2017DOI: 10.7324/JABB.2017.50207
This study designed to evaluate the ecological diversity of tree vegetation in Panjhora and Sipchu forest beats of Chalsa forest range, West Bengal, India. Both the forest beats are very well known for their characteristics as dense forest. To screen the ecological status of these forests a stratified random quadrate method was employed in the study. A total of 28 tree species were recorded from Panjhora Forest Beat and 31 tree species were recorded from Sipchu Forest Beat. The work conclude that though both the forest beats belong to same forest range, they differ in pattern of diversity in tree vegetation and specially in regard to the pattern of dominance.
Sarkar AK, Dey M, Mazumder M. A Comparative Study of Tree Species Composition of Panjhora Forest Beat and Sipchu Forest Beat of Chalsa Forest Range,West Bengal,India. J App Biol Biotech. 2017; 5 (02): 045-052. DOI: 10.7324/JABB.2017.50207
1. Battles JJ, Shlinsky AJ, Barrett RH, Heald RC and Allen-Diaz BH. The effects of forest management on plant species diversity in a Sierran conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 2001; 146: 211-222.
2. Berger WH and Parker FL. Diversity of plank tonic Foraminifer in deep sea Sediments Science, 1970; 168:1345-1347.
3. Chaubey OP, Prasad R and Mishra GP. Studies of Teak Plantation and mixed natural forest in Madhya Pradesh. J. Trop. For. 1988; 4: 22-35.
4. Chase JM and Leibold MA. Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 2003.
5. Das D, Pramanik BK and Mollay SK. A Model Classical Ecological report on Vegetation dynamics in Gorumara National Park in West Bengal, India. Int. J. Phar. &Biomedi. Rese., 2015; 2(2):1-14.
6. Hunter MD. Differential susceptibility to variable plant phenology and its role in competition between two herbivores on Oak. Ecological Entomology. 1990; 12: 373-382.
7. Khosla PK. 1992.Staus of Indian forestry problem and perspective. Indian Society of Tree Scientists, University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan (H.P.) India.
8. Kumar A and Ram J. Anthropogenic disturbances and plant biodiversity in forests of Uttaranchal, Central Himalaya. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2005; 14(2): 309-331.
9. Lloyd M and Ghelard RJ.A table for calculating the equitability component of species diversity, Journal of Animal Ecology, 1964; 33: 217-255.
10. Margalef R. 1968; Perspective in Ecological Theory, Uni. Of Chicago Press, 112.
11. Menhinick’s Index as Described by Whittaker, R. H. Evolution of species diversity In land communities. In Evolutionary biology eds Heeht M. K., W. C. Steee and B Wallace Plenum, NY. 1977.
12. Osorio LF, Bravo F, Zaldiver P and Pando V. Forest structure and plant diversity in aritime pine Pinus pinaster (Ait) stands. in central Spain. Investigación Agraria. Sistemas Recursos Forestales, 2009; 18(3):314-321.
13. Phillips EA. Methods of vegetation study. Henri Holt Co. Inc. 1959.
14. Pielou, EC. Species Diversity and pattern diversity of in the study of Ecological; Succession, Jour. Of theoretical Biology, 1966; 10: 370-383.
15. Sarkar AK. Ecological Studies of Tree Vegetation of Ramshai Forest Range, Gorumara National Park, India. Research Journal of Biological Sciences 2016; 5(7):53-59.
16. Sarkar AK. Phytosociological studies of tree vegetation of Moraghat forest range,India. Asian J. Biol. Life Sci. 2015; 4(3):217-220.
17. Shannon CE and Wiener W.1963; The Mathematical theory of Communication, University Illinois Press, Urban.
18. Simpson, EH. Measurement of Diversity, Nature., 1949; 163: 688.
19. Uma Shankar. A case of high tree diversity in a sal (Shorea robusta)-dominated lowland forest of Eastern Himalaya: Floristic composition, regeneration and conservation. Current Science, 2001; VOL.81, NO.7 (10): 776-786.
20. Vockenhuber EA, Scherber C, Langenbruch C, Meibbner M, Seidel D and Tscharntke T. Tree diversity and environmental context predict herb species richness and cover in Germany's largest connected deciduous forest. - Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution Systematics, 2011; 21(3): 111-119.
198 Absract views 188 PDF Downloads 386 Total views