Performance of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) accessions under intermittent water deficit stress in a tropical environment

Uchenna Noble Ukwu Blessing Ngozika Oburu Delight Promise Udochukwu Solomon Oluwaseyi Adewuyi Stella Ogochukwu Muojiama Vivian Ogechi Osadebe Ifesinachi Nelson Ezeh Patience Ukamaka Ishieze Nathaniel Dauda   

Open Access   

Published:  Jan 26, 2024

DOI: 10.7324/JABB.2024.158000
Abstract

Climate change is affecting the dynamics of crop production globally. Water is the most critical climatic factor influencing crop productivity, and water scarcity is projected to rise within the next decade due to climate change. The need arises to develop climate-resilient cultivars that can tolerate intermittent water shortages to ensure food security. The objective of this study was to assess the response of mungbean accessions to intermittent water shortages in a tropical environment. Ten mungbean accessions were evaluated for agronomic and physiological responses under no water stress (WS) (I1), 3-day intermittent WS (I3), and 7-day intermittent water-stress (I7) conditions in a split-plot design replicated thrice. Data on agronomic and physiological traits were analyzed. Accessions, WS, and interaction of accession and WS significantly affected the phenology, growth, and yield of mungbean (P < 0.05). The accessions generally responded better to I1 and I3 conditions in contrast to the I7 condition. The dendrogram report suggested that the ten accessions evolved from two parental lines. Growth and yield traits were significantly decreased by I7, but I3 was comparable to I1 in all yield-contributing traits measured (P > 0.05). Therefore, irrigating once in 3-days is sufficient for mungbean during dry spells. The accessions Tvr28, Tvr32, and Tvr83 were the best in grain yield and recorded the least reduction in relative water content and stress tolerance index under I7 and were, therefore, recommended for use in drought-prone areas. Tvr83 was distant from the others making it an excellent prospect for a mungbean improvement program, especially if traits such as a high leaf, pod, and seed number are desired. The findings of this study are indispensable in the struggle to mitigate the unfavourable effects of climate change on food security. It is particularly more relevant to the over 163 million people across the globe who currently experience unprecedented dry spells compared to 50 years ago. It provides a renewed hope that some accessions of mungbean can tolerate intermittent WS to a reasonable degree and still produce appreciable yields.


Keyword:     Climate-resilient accessions Genotypic variation Relative water content Stress tolerance Water use management


Citation:

Ukwu UN, Oburu BN, Udochukwu DP, Adewuyi SO, Muojiama SO, Osadebe VO, Ezeh IN, Ishieze PU, Dauda N. Performance of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) accessions under intermittent water deficit stress in a tropical environment. J App Biol Biotech. 2024. Online First. http://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2024.158000

Copyright: Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license.

HTML Full Text
Reference

1. UN. The Sustainable Development Goals Report. New York, USA; 2020. p. 66.

2. Pörtner HO, Roberts DC, Adams H, Adelekan I, Adler C, Adrian R, et al. Technical summary. In: Poloczanska ES, Mintenbeck K, Tignor M, Alegría A, Craig M, Langsdorf S, et al., editors. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK, New York, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2022. p. 37-118. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.002

3. Neenu S, Biswas AK, Rao AS. Impact of climate factors on crop production. A review. Agric Rev 2013;34:97-106.

4. UN. United Nations Climate Change Annual Report 2021. p. 1-74. Available from: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/unfccc_ annual_report_2020.pdf [Last accessed on 2021 Jul 21].

5. Torres-Ruiz JM, Diaz-Espejo A, Perez-Martin A, Hernandez- Santana V. Role of hydraulic and chemical signals in leaves, stems and roots in the stomatal behaviour of olive trees under water stress and recovery conditions. Tree Physiol 2015;35:415-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpu055

6. Raza MA, Saleem MF, Haider KI. Combined application of glycinebetaine and potassium on the nutrient uptake performance of wheat under drought stress. Pak J Agric Sci 2015;52:19-26.

7. Zhang D, Jiao X, Du Q, Song X, Li J. Reducing the excessive evaporative demand improved photosynthesis capacity at low costs of irrigation via regulating water driving force and moderating plant water stress of two tomato cultivars. Agric Water Manag 2018;199:22-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.11.014

8. Liang G, Liu J, Zhang J, Guo J. Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic and physiological parameters of tomato. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 2020;145:12-7. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS04725-19

9. Hanjra MA, Qureshi ME. Global water crisis and future security in an era of climate change. Food Policy 2010;35:365-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.05.006

10. Anjum NA, Umar S, Iqbal M, Khan NA. Cadmium causes oxidative stress in mung bean by affecting the antioxidant enzyme system and ascorbate-glutathione cycle metabolism. Russ J Plant Physiol 2011;58:92-9. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443710061019

11. Arumugam R, Rajasekaran S, Nagarajan SM. Response of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium inoculation on growth and chlorophyll content of Vigna unguiculata (L) walp var. Pusa 151. J Appl Sci Environ Manage 2010;14:113-5. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v14i4.63282

12. Tang D, Dong Y, Ren H, Li L, He C. A review of phytochemistry, metabolite changes, and medicinal uses of the common food mung bean and its sprouts (Vigna radiata). Chem Cent J 2014;8:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-8-4

13. Saleem MF, Raza MA, Ahmad S, Khan IH, Shahid AM. Understanding and mitigating the impacts of drought stress in cotton-a review. Pak J Agric Sci 2016;53:609-23. https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/16.3341

14. Sadeghipour O. Effect of withholding irrigation at different growth stages on yield and component of mungbean (Vigna radiate L. Wilczek) varieties. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 2008;4:590-4.

15. Ranawake AL, Dahanayaka N, Amarasingha UG, Rodrigo WD, Rodrigo UT. Effect of water stress on growth and yield of mung bean (Vigna radiata L). Trop Agric Res Ext 2012;14:1-4. https://doi.org/10.4038/tare.v14i4.4851

16. Ambachew S, Alamirew T, Melese A. Performance of mungbean under deficit irrigation application in the semi-arid highlands of Ethiopia. Agric Water Manag 2014;136:68-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.01.012

17. Hussen A, Worku W, Zewdie M. Effects of deficit irrigation and phosphorus levels on growth, yield, yield components and water use efficiency of mung bean (Vigna radiata (l.) Wilczek) at Alage, Central Rift valley of Ethiopia. Agric Res Technol Open Access J 2019;21:556167. https://doi.org/10.19080/ARTOAJ.2019.21.556167

18. Islam S, Akter MB, Paul NK, Khan MA, Amin R, Hakim MA. Physiological and biochemical responses of mungbean genotypes under water stress conditions. J Crop Sci Biotechnol 2018;21:431-9.

19. Sharma R, Gupta SK, Batra P. Identification of differentially expressed genes and regulatory networks in contrasting drought-tolerant mungbean genotypes under water stress. Plant Mol Biol Rep 2021;39:161-77.

20. Okoro EC, Ugwu EB, Onah IG, Omeje LC. Rainfall and solar irradiance monitoring in Nsukka zone, Nigeria. Eur J Stat Probab 2021;9:1-10.

21. Atlas. Nsukka Weather Atlas; 2021. Available from: https://www.weather-atlas.com/en/nigeria/nsukka-climate#humidity_relative [Last accessed on 2022 Jul 24].

22. Ihejiofor PN, Ukwu UN, Adeoye G. Determination of kolgrace bio-fertilizer rate for optimum greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) production in Ibadan, Southwest Nigeria. Agro Sci 2022;21:82-7. https://doi.org/10.4314/as.v21i1.13

23. Ihejiofor PN, Ukwu UN, Adeoye GO. Comparative effects of different levels of kolgrace organic fertilizer on the growth and yield attributes of greengram (Vigna radiata (L) Wilczek) in the screenhouse. Asian J Res Agric For 2020;6:1-7. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajraf/2020/v6i330104

24. Ukwu UN, Agbirionwu AC, Dauda N, Adewuyi SO, Osadebe VO, Anozie CC. Response of mungbean (Vigna radiata L Wilczek) genotypes to. different spacing types in derived savannah agroecology of Southeast Nigeria. Niger J Biotechnol 2023;40:77-85. https://doi.org/10.4314/njb.v40i1.9

25. Chukwu C, Ogoke IJ, Onyia VN. A Quick and Non-destructive Method of Determining Leaf Area in Mungbean (Vigna radiata L). In: Proceedings of the Crop Science Society of Nigeria, FUT-Owerri; 2020. p. 220-5.

26. Bangar P, Chaudhury A, Tiwari B, Kumar S, Kumari R, Bhat KV. Morphophysiological and biochemical response of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L) Wilczek] varieties at different developmental stages under drought stress. Turk J Biol 2019;48:58-69. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-1801-64

27. Brown J, Caligari PO, Campos HA. Plant Breeding. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Wiley Black Publishing Ltd.; 2014. p. 40-64.

28. Mwangi JW, Okoth OR, Kariuki MP, Piero NM. Genetic and phenotypic diversity of selected Kenyan mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) genotypes. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 2021;19:142-56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00245-9

29. Ukwu NU, Olasanmi B. Crossability among five Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) varieties. Mod Concepts Dev Agron 2018;2:1-6. https://doi.org/10.31031/MCDA.2018.02.000543

30. Ebert AW, Engels JM. Plant biodiversity and genetic resources matter! Plants 2020;9:1706. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9121706

31. Gayacharan C, Tripathi K, Meena SK, Panwar BS, Lal H, Rana JC, et al. Understanding genetic variability in the mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) gene pool. Ann Appl Biol 2020;177:346-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12624

32. Lambers H, Chapin II, Pons TL. Photosynthesis, respiration and long distance transport. In: Plant Physiological Ecology. 2nd ed. Germany: Springer; 2008. p. 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78341-3_2

33. Tawfik KM. Effect of water stress in addition to potassiomag application on mungbean. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 2008;2:42-52.

34. Khan MB, Hussain M, Raza A, Farooq S, Jabran K. Seed priming with CaCl2 and ridge planting for improved drought resistance in maize. Turk J Agric For 2015;39:193-203. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1405-39

35. Baroowa B, Gogoi N. Morpho-physiological and yield responses of black gram (Vigna mungo L.) and green gram (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes under drought at different growth stages. Res J Recent Sci 2016;5:43-50.

36. Hussain M, Malik MA, Farooq M, Ashraf MY, Cheema MA. Improving drought tolerance by exogenous application of glycinebetaine and salicylic acid in sunflower. J Agron Crop Sci 2008;194:193-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00305.x

37. Taiz L, Zeiger E. Plant Physiology. 5th ed. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates; 2010. p. 464.

38. Iqbal A, Fahad S, Iqbal M, Alamzeb M, Ahmad A, Anwar S, et al. Special Adaptive Features of Plant Species in Response to Drought. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 77-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40277-8_4

39. Martin-StPaul N, Delyon S, Cochard H. Plant resistance to drought depends on timely stomatal closure. Ecol Lett 2017;20:1437-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12851

40. Olsovska K, Kovar M, Brestic M, Zivcak M, Slamka P, Shao HB. Genotypically identifying wheat mesophyll conductance regulation under progressive drought stress. Front Plant Sci 2016;7:1111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01111

41. Luo DD, Wang CK, Jin Y. Plant water-regulation strategies: Isohydric versus anisohydric behavior. Chin J Plant Ecol 2017;41:1020-32. https://doi.org/10.17521/cjpe.2016.0366

42. Zare M, Dehghani B, Alizadeh O, Azarpanah A. The evaluation of various agronomic traits of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes under drought stress and non-stress conditions. Int J Farming Allied Sci 2013;2:764-70.

43. Zhou R, Kong L, Wu Z, Rosenqvist E, Wang Y, Zhao L, et al. Physiological response of tomatoes at drought, heat and their combination followed by recovery. Physiol Plant 2019;165:144-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12764

44. Chowdhury JA, Karim MA, Khaliq QA, Ahmed AU, Mondol AM. Effect of drought stress on water relation traits of four soybean genotypes. SAARC J Agric 2017;15:163-75. https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v15i2.35146

45. Ahmad A, Selim MM, Alderfasi AA, Afzal M. Effect of drought stress on mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) under arid climatic conditions of Saudi Arabia. In: Miralles I Garcia JL, Brebbia CA, editors. Ecosystem and Sustainable Development. Vol. 192. Southampton, UK: WIT Press; 2015. p. 185-93. https://doi.org/10.2495/ECO150171

Article Metrics

15 Absract views 33 PDF Downloads 48 Total views

Related Search

By author names

Citiaion Alert By Google Scholar