Research Article | Volume: 3, Issue: 6, Nov-Dec, 2015

Cryptic diversity of Aglaoctenus lagotis (Araneae, Lycosidae) in the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest: evidence from microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA sequence data

Camila Menezes Trindade Macrini Elen Arroyo Peres Vera Nisaka Solferini   

Open Access   

Published:  Dec 19, 2015

DOI: 10.7324/JABB.2015.3602

Tropical Spiders have been poorly studied, and studies regarding the distribution of genetic diversity in natural populations of these species are even more scarce. Among the spider genera, the South American genus Aglaoctenus includes species that build tube-shaped webs and display sub-social behavior that includes parental care. Herein we studied the population genetics of Aglaoctenus lagotis in five primary fragments of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest (with varying distances between 2 and 47 km) considered a conservation hotspot. In this study, we used two molecular markers: microsatellites and the COI mitochondrial gene. The data obtained indicated the presence of two genetic lineages (A and B), as evidenced by both markers, suggesting the presence of cryptic diversity. Lineages subpopulations are not completely isolated and have moderate structure (FST A=0.118; FST B= 0.142). Dispersal by air (or ballooning) must occur and possibly allows the maintenance of gene flow between sample sites. The hypotheses that lineages found here represent distinct species cannot be confirmed until further studies have been carried out. However, regardless of its taxonomic classification, the genetic lineages, found here, should be considered as individual units in future evolutionary studies of this species.

Keyword:     Conservationpopulation geneticsfragmentationspider.


Macrini CMT, Peres EA, Solferini VN. Cryptic diversity of Agloactenus lagotis (Araneae, Lycosidae) in the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest: evidence from microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA sequence data. J App Biol Biotech, 2015; 3 (06): 009-014. DOI: 10.7324/JABB.2015.3602

Copyright: Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license.

HTML Full Text

1. Platnick NI. An abundance of spiders. Natural History. 1995; 104 (3): 50-52 .

2. World Spider Catalog [Internet]. Natural History Museum Bern, version 16.5 [updated 2015 Jul 10; cited 2015 Jul 10]. Avaiable from

3. Santos AJ, Brescovit AD. A revision of the south american spider genus Aglaoctenus tullgren 1905 (aranae, lycosidae, sosippinae). Andrias. 2001; 15: 75-90.

4. Brescovit AD, Oliveira U, Santos AJ. Spiders (Araneae, Arachnida) from São Paulo State, Brazil: diversity, sampling efforts, and state-of-art. Biota Neotrop. 2001;11(1):717.

5. Brescovit AD. Araneae. In: Brandão CRF, Vasconcelos EM, editors. Biodiversidade do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil: Síntese do conhecimento ao final do seculo XX, São Paulo: Fapesp; 1999, p. 45-56.

6. Ford MJ. Locomotory activity and predation strategy of the wolf spider Pardosa amentata (Clerck) (Lycosidae). 1978; Animal Behavior 26: 31-35.

7. Foelix RF. Biology of Spiders. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.

8. Wise DH. Spiders in Ecological Webs. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

9. Gonzaga MO. Sociedade e cuidado parental. In: Gonzaga MO, Santos AJ, Japyassu HF, editors. Ecologia e comportamento de aranhas, Rio de Janeiro: Editora Interciência; 2007, p. 185-208.

10. Stefani V, Del-claro K, Silva LA; Guimarães B, Tizo-Pedroso E. Mating behaviour and maternal care in the tropical savanna funnel-web spider Aglaoctenus lagotis Holmberg (Araneae: Lycosidae). Journal of Natural History. 2001; 45 (17): 1119-1129.

11. Vieira C, Japyassú HF, Santos AJ, Gonzaga MO. Teias e forrageamento. In: Gonzaga MO, Santos AJ, Japyassu HF, editors. Ecologia e comportamento de aranhas, Rio de Janeiro: Editora Interciência; 2007, p. 45-66.

12. Riechert, SE. Web-site selection in the desert spider Agelenopsis aperta. Oikos. 1976; 27: 311-315.

13. Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP, Martensen AC, Ponzoni FJ, Hirota MM. The brazilian atlantic forest: How much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? implications for conservation. Biological Conservation. 2009; 142 (6): 1141-1153.

14. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000; 403 (6772): 853-858.

15. Laurance WF, Nascimento HEM, Laurance SG, Andrade A, Ribeiro JElS, Giraldo JP, Lovejoy TE, Condit R, Chave J, Harms KE, D'Angelo S. Rapid decay of tree-community composition in amazonian forest fragments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006; 103 (50): 19010-14.

16. Groeneveld J, Alves L, Bernacci L, Catharino E, Knogge C, Metzger J, Putz S, Huth A. The impact of fragmentation and density regulation on forest succession in the atlantic rain forest. Ecological Modelling. 2009; 220 (19):2450-2459.

17. Schwarcz KD, Pataca CL, Abreu AG, Bariani JM, Macrini CMT, Solferini VN. Fragmentation effect on Astronium graveolens Jacq. (Anacardiaceae) and Metrodorea nigra A. St-Hil. (Rutaceae): Two species with distinct seed dispersion strategies. Botanical Journal of Linnean Society. 2010; 164 (3): 326-336.

18. Putz S, Groeneveld J, Alves LF, Metzger JP, Huth A. Fragmentation drives tropical forest fragments to early successional states: a modelling study for brazilian atlantic forests. Ecological Modelling. 2011; 222 (12): 1986-1997.

19. Mendes CP, Ribeiro MC, Galetti M. Patch size, shape and edge distance influence seed predation on a palm species in the Atlantic forest. Ecography. 2005 38: 001–011. doi:10.1111/ecog.01592

20. Baldissera R, Rodrigues ENL, Hartz SM. Metacommunity Composition of Web-Spiders in a Fragmented Neotropical Forest: Relative Importance of Environmental and Spatial Effects. Plos one. 2012 7;10:e48099. doi: 10.1371/e48099

21. Moreira VSS, Del-Claro K. Oviposition and post-embryonic development of Aglaoctenus lagotis (Araneae: Lycosidae). Zoologia, 2001; 28 (5): 565-570

22. Abreu AG, Albaina A, Alpermann TJ, Apkenas VE, Bankhead-Dronnet S, Bergek S, Berumen M L, CHO C-H, Clobert J, Coulon A, De Feraudy D, Estomba A, Hankeln T, Hochkirch A, Hsu T, Huang, T Irigoin X, Iriondo M Kay, Kathleen M, Kinitz T, Kothera L, Le Hénanff, M, Lieutier F, Lourdais O, Macrini, C M T, Manzano C, Martin C, Morris VRF, Nanninga G, Pardo MA, Plieske J, Pointeau S, Prestegaard T, Quack M, Richard M, Savage HM, Schwarcz KD, Shade J, Simms EL, Solferini VN Permanent Genetic Resources added to Molecular Ecology Resources Database 1 October 2011 – 30 November 2011. Molecular Ecolology Resourses. 2011; 12(2):374-376.

23. Sanguinetti CJ, Dias-Neto E, Simpson AJG. Rapid silver staining and recovery of PCR products separated on polyacrylamide gels. Biotechniques. 1994; 17(5): 915-919.

24. Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 1994; 87(6): 651-701.

25. Hedin MC, Maddison WPA. Combined molecular approach to phylogeny of the jumping spider subfamily dendryphantinae (araneae: Salticidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2001; 18 (3): 386-403.

26. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme, editors. F. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous windows tm pour la genetique des populations [internet]. Montpellier: Université de Montpellier II; 2004. [cited 2015 May 15]. Available from:

27. Raymond M, Rousset F. GENEPOP (version 1.2) population genetic software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity. 1995; 86 (3): 248-249.

28. Marshall, TC, Slate, J, Kruuk, LEB & Pemberton, JM. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology. 1998; 7(5): 639-655.

29. Rice WR. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution. 1989; 43(1): 223-225.

30. Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution. 1984; 38 (6): 1358–1370.

31. Goudet, J. FSTAT version 1.2: a computer program to calculate f-statistics. Journal of Heredity. 1995; 86 (6): 485-486.

32. Mantel N. Detection of a disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research. 1967; 27 (2):209-220.

33. Mantel N, Valand RS. A technique of nonparametric multivariate analysis. Biometrics. 1970; 26 (3):547-558.

34. Chapuis, MP and Estoup A. Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Molecular Biology and Evolution . 2007; 24 (3): 621-631.

35. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000; 155 (2): 945-959.

36. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology. 2005;14 (8): 2611-2620

37. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin, F, Higgins, DG. The Clustral X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research. 1997; 25 (24):4876–4882.

38. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S Mega4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (mega) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2007; 24 (8): 1596-1599.

39. Clement, M, D Posada, KA Crandall TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology. 2000; 9 (10):1657-1659.

40. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial dna. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 1985; 22 (2):160-174.

41. Posada, D, Crandall KA Modeltest: testing the model of dna substitution. Bioinformatics. 1998; 14 (9): 817-818.

42. Zwickl DJ, editor. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion [internet]. Austin: University of Texas; 2006 [cited 2015 May 10]. Avaiable from: antisense/zwicklDissertation.pdf.

43. Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, deWaard JR. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related specieis. Proceedings of Royal Society of London B. 2003; 270 (S1): S96-S99.

44. Robinson EA, Blagoev GA, Hebert PDN, Adamowicz SJ. Prospects for using DNA barcoding to identify spiders in species-rich genera. ZooKeys. 2009; 16: 27-46.

45. Ramirez MG, Fandino LB. Genetic variability and gene ow in metepeira ventura (araneae, araneidae). Journal of Arachnology. 1996; 24 (1):1-8.

46. Ramirez MG, Haakonsen KE. Gene flow among habitat patches on a fragmented landscape in the spider argiope trifasciata (araneae: Araneidae). Heredity. 1999; 83 (5): 580-585.

Article Metrics

221 Absract views 187 PDF Downloads 408 Total views

Related Search

By author names

Citiaion Alert By Google Scholar

Similar Articles