Home > Past Issue

Volume: 3, Issue: 6, Nov-Dec, 2015
DOI: 10.7324/JABB.2015.3605

Research Article

Species relationships in Chenopodium quinoa and Chenopodium album on the basis of morphology and SDS-PAGE profiles of soluble seed proteins

Rajkumari Jashmi Devi, Nikhil K Chrungoo

Abstract

Nineteen accessions of Chenopodium, comprising of 11 accessions of C. quinoa and 8 accessions of C. album were evaluated. Morphological variations were observed in leaf colour, shape and margins, type of pollen grains, seed colour, seed coat texture and morphology of seed edges amongst the accessions. SDS-PAGE profiling of soluble seed proteins revealed 22 bands ranging in molecular mass from 26-68 kDa. While 6 protein bands were monomorphic, 16 protein bands were polymorphic. One band representing protein with molecular mass of 35.76 kDa was detected only in the accession IC-341704 of C. album. Five exotic accessions viz. EC-507744, EC-507742, EC-507738, EC-5077391 and EC-507741, belonging to C. quinoa, showed the presence of a duplex of 33.55 and 29.59 kDa bands which was not detected in any other accession. The dendrogram generated from the scoring profiles of SDS-PAGE of soluble seed proteins segregated the accession as per their taxonomic classification into C. quinoa and C. album. While the accessions belonging to C. album showed a high degree of morphological heterogeneity, the SDS-PAGE profiles of seed proteins indicated low level of variations within the accessions of each species. Further, the accessions IC-411824 and IC-411825 showed more closeness with C. quinoa than C. album.

Keywords: Chenopodium quinoa, C. album, SDS-PAGE, soluble seed protein.

References

1. K\ühn U. Chenopodiaceae. In: Kubitzki, K. (Ed) The families and genera of vascular plants, Springer, Hamburg; 1993, p 253-281.

2. Bhargava A, Shukla S, Srivastava J, Singh N, Ohri D. Genetic diversity for mineral accumulation in the foliage of Chenopodium spp. Sci Hortic. 2008; 118: 338-346.

3. Koziol MJ. Chemical composition and nutritional value of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). J Food Compost Anal. 1992; 5: 35-68.

4. Ruales J, Nair BM. Nutritional quality of the protein in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa, willd) seeds. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1992; 42:1-11.

5. Wilson H, Manhart J. Crop/weed gene flow: Chenopodium quinoa Willd. and C. berlandieri Moq. Theor Appl Genet. 1993; 86: 642-648.

6. Bhargava A, Shukla S, Ohri D. Karyotypic studies on some cultivated and wild species of Chenopodium (chenopodiaceae). Genet Resour Crop Ev. 2006; 53: 1309-1320.

7. Kolano B, Siwińska D, Małuszyńska J. Comparative cytogenetic analysis of diploid and hexaploid Chenopodium album Agg. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2008; 77: 293-298.

8. Fuentes-Bazan S, Mansion G, Borsch T (2012) Towards a species level tree of the globally diverse genus Chenopodium (Chenopodiaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 62: 359-374.

9. Wilson HD. Quinoa and relatives (Chenopodium sect. Chenopodium subsect. Cellulata). Econ Bot. 1990; 44: 92-110.

10. Wilson HD. Artificial Hybridization among Species of Chenopodium sect. Chenopodium. Syst Botany. 1980; 5: 253-263.

11. Gangopadhyay G, Das S, Makhwrjee KK. Speciation in Chenopodium in west Bengal, India. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2002; 49: 503-510.

12. Anderson WR. Genetic relationships among 19 accessions of six species of Chenopodium L. by random amplified polymorphic DNA fragments (RAPD). Euphytica. 1999; 105: 25-32.

13. Rana TS, Narzary D, Ohri D. Genetic diversity and relationships among some wild and cultivated species of Chenopodium L. (Amaranthaceae) using RAPD and DAMD methods. Curr Sci. 2010; 98: 840-846.

14. Mason SL, Stevens MR, Jellen EN, Bonifacio A, Fairbanks DJ, Coleman CE, McCarty RR, Rasmussen AG, Maughan PJ. Development and use of microsatellite markers for germplasm characterization in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Crop Sci. 2005; 45:1618-1630.

15. Maughan PJ, Kolano BA, Maluszynska J, Coles ND, Bonifacio A, Rojas J, Coleman CE, Stevens MR, Fairbanks DJ, Parkinson SE, Jellen EN. Molecular and cytological characterization of ribosomal RNA genes in Chenopodium quinoa and Chenopodium berlandieri. Genome. 2006; 49: 825-839.

16. Mehra P, Malik C. Cytology of some Indian Chenopodiaceae. Caryologia. 1963; 16: 67-84.

17. Mukherjee KK. A comparative study of two cytotypes of Chenopodium album in West Bengal, India. Can J Bot. 1986; 64: 754-759.

18. Rahiminejad MR, Gornall RJ. Flavonoid evidence for allopolyploidy in the Chenopodium album aggregate (Amaranthaceae). Plant Syst Evol. 2004; 246: 77-87.

19. Ruas PM, Bonifacio A, Ruas CF, Fairbanks DJ, Andersen WR. Genetic relationships among 19 accessions of six species of Chenopodium L. by random amplified polymorphic DNA fragments (RAPD). Euphytica. 1999; 105:25-32.

20. Rana TS, Narzary D, Ohri D. Molecular differentiation of Chenopodium album complex and some related species using ISSR profiles and ITS sequences. Gene. 2011; 495: 29-35.

21. Clements SE, Mosyakin SL. Flora of North America Volume 4: Magnoliophyta: Caryophyllidae, Part 1, Chenopodiaceae, Chenopodium. Oxford University Press, Toronto; 2004.

22. Partap T, Kapoor P The Himalayan grain Chenopods ll. Comparative morphology. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 1985; 14: 201-220.

23. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive m ethod for the quantification of micrograms of protein utilizing the principle dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976; 72: 248-254.

24. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970; 227: 680-685.

25. Bhargava A, Shukla S, Ohri D. Evaluation of foliage yield and leaf quality traits in Chenopodium spp. in multiyear trials. Euphytica. 2007a; 153: 199-213.

26. Karcz J, Kolano B, Maluszynska J. SEM studies on fruit and seed of some Chenopodium L. species (Chenopodiaceae). XII International Conference on Plant Embryology, Cracow, Poland; 2005.

27. Baar H. Zur Anatomie und Keimungsphysiologie heteromorpher Samen von Chenopodium album and Atriplex nitens. Sitzungsber Kaiserl Akad Wiss Wien. 1913; 121: 21-40.

28. Williams JT, Harper JL. Seed dimorphism and germination. I. The influence of nitrates and low temperatures on the germination of Chenopodium album. Weed Res. 1965; 5: 141-150.

29. Harper JL. Population biology of plants. London: Academic Press; 1977.

30. Roberts HA, Neilson JE. Seed survival and periodicity of seedling emergence in some species of Atriplex, Chenopodium, Polygonum and Rumex. Ann Appl Biol. 1980; 94: 111-120.

31. Kamayeva GM. Heterocarpy and heterospermy of the weedy Chenopodium and Atriplex occurring in Voronezh province. In: Khmelyov KF (Eds) Vegetation of the Black Earth Region and its protection, Voronezh University Press; 1987, p 57-62.

32. Matilla A, Gallardo M, Puga-Hermida MI. Structural, physiological and molecular aspects of heterogeneity in seeds: Areview. Seed Sci Res. 2005; 15: 63-76.

33. Yao S, Lan H, Zhang F. Variation of seed heteromorphism in Chenopodium album and the effect of salinity stress on the descendants. Ann Bot. 2010; 105: 1015-1025.

34. Fairbanks DJ, Burgener KW, Robison LR, Andersen WR, Ballon E. Electrophoretic characterization of quinoa seed proteins. Plant Breed. 1990; 104: 190-195.

35. Bhargava A, Rana TS, Shukla S, Ohri D. Seed protein electrophoresis of some cultivated and wild species of Chenopodium (Chenopodiaceae). Biol Plant. 2005; 49: 505-511.

36. Drzewiecki J, Delgado-Licon E, Haruenkit A. Identification and Differences of Total Proteins and Their Soluble Fractions in Some Pseudocereals Based on Electrophoretic Patterns. J Agri Food Chem. 2003; 51: 7798-7804.

37. Wilson HD. Allozyme variation and morphological relationships of Chenopodium hircinum (sl). Syst Botany. 1988; 215-228.

How to cite this article:
Devi RJ and Chrungoo NK. Species relationships in Chenopodium quinoa and Chenopodium album on the basis of morphology and SDS-PAGE profiles of soluble seed proteins. J App Biol Biotech, 2015; 3 (06): 029-033. DOI: 10.7324/JABB.2015.3605

ARTICLE TOOLS

ARTICLE STATISTICS

  • Viewed: 121
  • Downloaded: 122

  Search by Author


      

  Search in Pubmed


   Search in Google Scholar